CiviCRM Community Forums (archive)

*

News:

Have a question about CiviCRM?
Get it answered quickly at the new
CiviCRM Stack Exchange Q+A site

This forum was archived on 25 November 2017. Learn more.
How to get involved.
What to do if you think you've found a bug.



  • CiviCRM Community Forums (archive) »
  • Old sections (read-only, deprecated) »
  • Discussion (deprecated) »
  • Alpha and Beta Release Testing »
  • 3.2 Release Testing »
  • website - primary
Pages: [1]

Author Topic: website - primary  (Read 1437 times)

lcdweb

  • Forum Godess / God
  • I live on this forum
  • *****
  • Posts: 1620
  • Karma: 116
    • www.lcdservices.biz
  • CiviCRM version: many versions...
  • CMS version: Joomla/Drupal
  • MySQL version: 5.1+
  • PHP version: 5.2+
website - primary
July 19, 2010, 06:39:43 am
just curious why the new multi-option for website doesn't have a primary selection option? i can see why it doesn't lend itself toward needing that as much as the other communication fields, but still think that it would be useful, especially when it comes to the export function.

also, the option group values for the website type should have a link in the main administer screen, and probably in the nav menu as well.

lastly, i notice there is a "mobile phone type" option, but that field isn't accessible when creating a phone number of type mobile. is it intended to be used elsewhere? it's currently present on the option list menu, and probably doesn't need to be.
support CiviCRM through 'make it happen' initiatives!
http://civicrm.org/mih

Kurund Jalmi

  • Administrator
  • I’m (like) Lobo ;)
  • *****
  • Posts: 4169
  • Karma: 128
    • CiviCRM
  • CiviCRM version: 4.x, future
  • CMS version: Drupal 7, Joomla 3.x
  • MySQL version: 5.5.x
  • PHP version: 5.4.x
Re: website - primary
July 19, 2010, 06:50:35 am
Quote
just curious why the new multi-option for website doesn't have a primary selection option? i can see why it doesn't lend itself toward needing that as much as the other communication fields, but still think that it would be useful, especially when it comes to the export function.
This because we thought there won't be more than one url for each type like people won't have 2 twitter or 2 facebook accounts.

Quote
lastly, i notice there is a "mobile phone type" option, but that field isn't accessible when creating a phone number of type mobile. is it intended to be used elsewhere? it's currently present on the option list menu, and probably doesn't need to be.

Mobile option is available here: http://drupal.demo.civicrm.org/civicrm/contact/add?ct=Individual&reset=1

Kurund

Found this reply helpful? Support CiviCRM

lcdweb

  • Forum Godess / God
  • I live on this forum
  • *****
  • Posts: 1620
  • Karma: 116
    • www.lcdservices.biz
  • CiviCRM version: many versions...
  • CMS version: Joomla/Drupal
  • MySQL version: 5.1+
  • PHP version: 5.2+
Re: website - primary
July 19, 2010, 07:22:20 am
I'd vote for adding the primary option. For example a person might have a facebook, twitter, myspace account, but one would be identified as the primary social networking account and included in exports. Not a big need, and probably less important than the other communication fields, but still useful. And it would retain consistent structure with the rest of the fields in this section.

Re: mobile option --
I'm not referring to the option to identify a phone number as mobile. I'm referring to the mobile provider options:
http://drupal.demo.civicrm.org/civicrm/admin/options/mobile_provider&group=mobile_provider&reset=1

I don't see where those are ever exposed to the interface. I think they're a remnant from an early attempt at CiviSMS. If so, we may want to remove them from the option list choices, and from the nav menu.
support CiviCRM through 'make it happen' initiatives!
http://civicrm.org/mih

Pages: [1]
  • CiviCRM Community Forums (archive) »
  • Old sections (read-only, deprecated) »
  • Discussion (deprecated) »
  • Alpha and Beta Release Testing »
  • 3.2 Release Testing »
  • website - primary

This forum was archived on 2017-11-26.