CiviCRM Community Forums (archive)

*

News:

Have a question about CiviCRM?
Get it answered quickly at the new
CiviCRM Stack Exchange Q+A site

This forum was archived on 25 November 2017. Learn more.
How to get involved.
What to do if you think you've found a bug.



  • CiviCRM Community Forums (archive) »
  • Old sections (read-only, deprecated) »
  • Discussion (deprecated) »
  • Feature Requests and Suggestions (Moderator: Dave Greenberg) »
  • Data sharing?
Pages: [1]

Author Topic: Data sharing?  (Read 2143 times)

argash

  • Guest
Data sharing?
March 31, 2008, 01:38:16 pm
Forgive me if this is already possible but I can't find it any where if it is.

We have a state organization comprised of local county chapters.  What I would like to do is have each county org to have its own crm db that feeds the state DB.  That part I could probably do on my own (just scrape the db's every so often).  But the tricky part is I'd like the state DB to be able to feed its updates back to the counties.  This is particularly important for when members move throughout the state. 

acrosman

  • Guest
Re: Data sharing?
March 31, 2008, 01:55:20 pm
If you really want them all to have separate databases I'm not sure I've seen this implemented...yet.  There are several organizations that I've talked with about something like this, that are interested in the concept.  The organization I work for is one; we're hoping to develop this kind of setup over time (we have larger problems at the moment, and we'd like to have everyone in a database first, we'll get to merging/linking them later).  If someone has solved this scenario, or can has made substantial progress in this direction I'd love to know about it.

petednz

  • Forum Godess / God
  • I’m (like) Lobo ;)
  • *****
  • Posts: 4899
  • Karma: 193
    • Fuzion
  • CiviCRM version: 3.x - 4.x
  • CMS version: Drupal 6 and 7
Re: Data sharing?
March 31, 2008, 02:45:27 pm
If there are really good reasons for separate databases then ignore this, but I think the way to go is to have just the one CiviCRM set up and use the access controls to lock the system down so each sub-region only has access to members in their area. This is how we have implemented it for a national organisation that has 'chapters' all of whom need access to 'their members'.
We have set up 'manager groups' for each of our regions (not Smart Groups but we can run a cron to keep it uptodate on a daily basis) and then have SmartGroups for all contacts in region A, B and C.
The Managers for A then have view/edit rights to members in A, and Managers in B for B etc..
And of course national Managers have access across the whole scheme.
Hope that helps
Sign up to StackExchange and get free expert advice: https://civicrm.org/blogs/colemanw/get-exclusive-access-free-expert-help

pete davis : www.fuzion.co.nz : connect + campaign + communicate

acrosman

  • Guest
Re: Data sharing?
April 01, 2008, 06:08:50 am
I think in the vast majority of cases having 1 dataset with ACL's to control access is the better way to go.  I'll just say that we have reasons, I'm not sure they are all good ones, but we have them none-the-less.

Pages: [1]
  • CiviCRM Community Forums (archive) »
  • Old sections (read-only, deprecated) »
  • Discussion (deprecated) »
  • Feature Requests and Suggestions (Moderator: Dave Greenberg) »
  • Data sharing?

This forum was archived on 2017-11-26.