CiviCRM Community Forums (archive)

*

News:

Have a question about CiviCRM?
Get it answered quickly at the new
CiviCRM Stack Exchange Q+A site

This forum was archived on 25 November 2017. Learn more.
How to get involved.
What to do if you think you've found a bug.



  • CiviCRM Community Forums (archive) »
  • Old sections (read-only, deprecated) »
  • Developer Discussion (Moderator: Donald Lobo) »
  • Poll: Developer Discussion Media
Pages: [1]

Author Topic: Poll: Developer Discussion Media  (Read 744 times)

totten

  • Administrator
  • Ask me questions
  • *****
  • Posts: 695
  • Karma: 64
Poll: Developer Discussion Media
November 11, 2015, 06:41:12 pm
Chatting with some other active maintainers, there was some interest in moving the long-form developer discussions from the forum to mailing-lists. Quick poll:

http://goo.gl/forms/PU0T84amdz

totten

  • Administrator
  • Ask me questions
  • *****
  • Posts: 695
  • Karma: 64
Re: Poll: Developer Discussion Media
November 11, 2015, 07:24:13 pm
To address a few things that have come in comments:

Any mailing list for developer discussion will have public archives. This is a strong requirement.

In terms of the specific tool used for mailing-lists, civicrm.org currently uses both Sympa (eg civicrm-api) and Google Groups (eg civicrm-partner-program) about evenly. Both are quite serviceable for email-based usage. They have some trade-offs individually, e.g.

  • Sympa can integrate with users and groups on civicrm.org. So you could manage mailing-list memberships the same way you handle newsletter or blog access. This is also nice from a dogfooding perspective, and we can come up with more interesting flows (eg autoenrolling partners and members into respective lists). Sympa is open-source.
  • Google Groups provides a web interface for making posts. (There's some dispute about whether this interface is actually nice, but it does more than Sympa's.) Google Groups ties in a bit better with your Google/Gmail account.
  • The visual layout in Google Groups has prettier styling, but the structure in Sympa is simpler (less busy).

If you feel the differences are important, feel free to comment in the survey or forum about how (and whether that would affect your vote).

Pages: [1]
  • CiviCRM Community Forums (archive) »
  • Old sections (read-only, deprecated) »
  • Developer Discussion (Moderator: Donald Lobo) »
  • Poll: Developer Discussion Media

This forum was archived on 2017-11-26.